Work

Punish or forgive? Exploring the mediating role of perceived CEO attitude on the interaction of emotional crisis communication and crisis type

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: This study explores how crisis type, specifically product-harm (i.e., performance-related) vs. moral-harm (i.e., value-related) and CEO’s emotional expression (anger vs. shame) in organizational crisis response affect publics’ punishment expectations and forgiveness after a crisis. Additionally, it examines the mediating roles of perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) in these relationships. Using a 2 (crisis type: product-harm vs. moral-harm) × 2 (CEO emotional expression: anger vs. shame) between-subjects design ( N = 406, recruited via CloudResearch), the results showed that a product-harm crisis significantly triggered higher punishment expectations and lower forgiveness compared to a moral-harm crisis. However, contrary to expectations, the CEO’s emotional expression did not directly influence the intended punishment or forgiveness. Furthermore, perceived CEO attitudes (i.e., arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediated these effects on intended behaviors among participants. Significant moderated mediation effects were detected when the CEO expressed anger. In product-harm crises, such expressions of anger reduced perceptions of the CEO’s sincerity and increased perceptions of arrogance, which in turn heightened punishment expectations and lowered forgiveness. Both theoretical and practical implications of the current study are discussed. • This study explores how crisis type and CEO emotional expression affect public intentions to punish or forgive an organization. • Product-harm crises lead to more punishment and less forgiveness, especially when the CEO expresses anger. • Perceived CEO attitudes (arrogance and sincerity) significantly mediate the effects of crisis type and emotional response on public reactions. • Findings offer new theoretical insights and practical guidance for tailoring emotional tone and leadership communication in crisis response strategies.

Source: Public Relations Review

DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102651

Authors: James Ndone, Qi Zheng, Rongting Niu, Yan Jin, Margaret Duffy

Institutions: Coastal Carolina University, Michigan State University, University of Georgia, University of Missouri

Language: English

Topic: Public Relations and Crisis Communication

Subfield: Communication

Field: Social Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Peace, justice, and strong institutions

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $4,310