Year: 2025
Type: book-chapter
Abstract: Scientific publishing is evolving, but the PDF endures as the gold standard: static, formal, and supposedly unimpeachable. In this satirical commentary, I examine the widening gap between traditional publication norms, and emerging channels of science communication, including blogs, podcasts, social media threads, and video tutorials. While critiquing institutional inertia, and performative rigor, I also caution against mistaking popularity for impact. I argue for a broader, more accessible model of scientific exchange, one that respects methodological integrity while embracing clarity, conversation, and reach. PDFs are not obsolete, but they are no longer enough. In an age of hypercommunication, perhaps the greatest risk is being understood.
Source: Aperture Neuro
DOI: 10.52294/001c.147146
Author: Omer Faruk Gulban
Institutions: Maastricht University, Brain Innovation (Netherlands)
Language: English
Subfield: Information Systems and Management
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4416718538