Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Objective This study compared standardized oxygen consumption responses during rescue tasks with varying loads and methods across different fatigue states in firefighters to identify optimal rescue strategies and enhance operational efficiency. Methods Sixty-three professional healthy male firefighters were recruited. Oxygen consumption was measured using a wearable metabolic system as they performed 5 × 20-m shuttle sprints with different task loads (10 kg, 20 kg, 30 kg) and rescue methods (shoulder-, cradle-, hand-carrying) under five fatigue states (non-fatigue, whole-body, and mild/moderate/severe knee fatigue). Results A mixed-model ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of task load on standardized oxygen consumption (F = 620.61, P < 0.001, ƞ p 2 = 0.798). Post-hoc tests showed that standardized oxygen consumption was significantly lower during medium-load (2.464 ± 0.616 mL/min/kg 2 ) and large-load tasks (1.615 ± 0.317 mL/min/kg 2 ) compared to small-load tasks (4.718 ± 1.043 mL/min/kg 2 ) (all P < 0.05). Consumption during large-load tasks was also significantly lower than during medium-load tasks (P < 0.05). The main effects of fatigue states and rescue methods were not significant. Conclusion Task load is the primary factor influencing oxygen efficiency during high-intensity shuttle sprints. Large-load tasks resulted in significantly lower standardized oxygen consumption across all fatigue states and rescue methods, indicating a “small load-low efficiency” phenomenon. Prioritizing large-load (30 kg) tasks in time-critical emergencies may improve rescue efficiency.
Source: Frontiers in Physiology
Authors: Xinxin Zhang, Chengxiu Li, Yong Zhou, Weiguo Liu
Language: English
Subfield: Occupational Therapy
Field: Health Professions
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
OpenAlex ID: W4416730473