Guidelines for tick-borne diseases (excluding Lyme borreliosis): diagnosis and management
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: • Tick-borne diseases can present differently from Lyme borreliosis, often with acute fever as a key sign, and biological abnormalities. • Diagnosis is challenging due to limited awareness and access to testing tools. • Eight main infections are outlined: rickettsiosis, tularaemia, tick-borne encephalitis, relapsing fever, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, neoehrlichiosis, and Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever. • Doxycycline is effective against most of these agents except Babesia and TBEV. • Ongoing research is expanding understanding of newly recognised pathogens like Neoehrlichia. Other tick-borne microorganisms can cause symptoms that differ from those of Lyme borreliosis, often with a more acute course. Fever is the primary clinical warning sign, which may be accompanied by various other symptoms—cutaneous, neuromeningeal, and lymphatic—that help guide diagnosis. A clinical approach makes it relatively straightforward to distinguish Lyme borreliosis from other tick-borne diseases, with the common factor being the tick as the vector. Biological abnormalities (anaemia, thrombocytopenia, cytolysis, etc.) are often present in tick-borne diseases, unlike in Lyme borreliosis. However, these other infectious agents remain poorly known and understood. Although diagnostic tools exist, they are often not readily accessible in primary care settings or even in hospitals, which likely leads to underdiagnosis of these infections. This final section of the guidelines details eight tick-borne diseases in order of frequency: rickettsiosis, tularaemia, tick-borne encephalitis, tick-borne relapsing fever, anaplasmosis, babesiosis, neoehrlichiosis, and Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever. Co-infections, which are very rare, are also presented with their definitions and characteristics. The choice of doxycycline as the first-line treatment for Lyme borreliosis seems particularly appropriate, as most of these infectious agents (except Babesia and TBEV) are sensitive to this antibiotic. As scientific research advances, our understanding continues to grow. Agents such as Neoehrlichia are recent discoveries, and their significance in human pathology remains to be fully elucidated. It is expected that in the coming years, expanding knowledge of other tick-borne diseases will improve diagnosis and patient care.
Source: Infectious Diseases Now
Authors: Y. Hansmann, E. Baux, C. Eldin, C. Cazorla, B. Jaulhac, H. Yssel, R. Ghozzi, C. Lenormand, A. Gautier, J. Sevestre, A. Raffetin
Institutions: Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy, Inserm, Aix-Marseille Université, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Unité des Virus Emergents, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne, Pathogens Host Arthropod Vectors Interfaces, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Risques Infectieux Tropicaux Microorganismes EmergentS, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges
Language: English
Subfield: Parasitology
Field: Immunology and Microbiology
Domain: Life Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $1,640
OpenAlex ID: W4416768120
