The impact of PEEP-guided electrical impedance tomography on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics in moderate-to-severe ARDS: a randomized controlled trial
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial
Abstract: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration may optimize ventilation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We compared EIT-guided PEEP with low PEEP/FiO₂ strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. In this randomized controlled trial, 108 patients with PaO₂/FiO₂ below 200 mmHg were allocated to EIT-guided PEEP after a recruitment maneuver (n = 56) or low PEEP/FiO₂ strategy (n = 52). Patients in the EIT group underwent PEEP titration guided by the intersection point between alveolar overdistension and collapse during a decremental PEEP trial. Primary outcomes were oxygenation (PaO₂/FiO₂) and static compliance. Secondary outcomes included mortality, ventilator-free days, ICU stay, barotrauma, rescue therapies, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score changes. On day 1, oxygenation was higher with EIT (mean PaO₂/FiO₂ 180 vs. 159 mmHg; p = 0.036). Static compliance was greater at both day 1 (26 vs. 23 mL/cmH₂O; p = 0.016) and day 2 (27 vs. 24 mL/cmH₂O; p = 0.029). Driving pressure was lower with EIT at day 1 (16 vs. 17 cmH₂O; p < 0.001) and day 2 (15 vs. 17 cmH₂O; p = 0.005). SOFA scores improved more in the EIT group (day 1: - 1 vs. 0, p = 0.013; day 2: - 1 vs. - 0.5, p = 0.015). Twenty-eight-day mortality was lower with EIT (29 vs. 44%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.090). ICU stay, ventilation duration, barotrauma, ECMO use, and rescue therapies were similar. Benefits were most pronounced in patients with severe ARDS. EIT-guided PEEP improved oxygenation, lung mechanics, and reduced organ dysfunction in moderate-to-severe ARDS, particularly in severe cases. It showed a trend toward reduced mortality and may serve as a practical bedside tool for lung-protective ventilation. Larger multicenter trials are needed to confirm its clinical benefits.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials, NCT06733168. Registered on 13/12/2024, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06733168 .
Source: Scientific Reports
Authors: Dinh Van Trung, Bui Thi Huong Giang, Dang Quoc Tuan, Nguyen Cong Tan, Pham The Thach, Bui Van Cuong, Nguyen Ba Cuong, Trinh The Anh, Nguyen Tu Anh, Nguyen Van Huy, Ho Duc Trieu, Nguyen Van Trong, Tran Thu Trang, Vuong Xuan Toan, Nguyen Hoang Nam, Nguyen Thi Sam, Truong Mau Thanh, Nguyen Tien Dat, Nghiem Thi Phuong Hong, Pham Thi Hong Phuong, Dang Duy Hien, Do Van Hoi, Hoang Tuan Phong, Nguyen Dang Thu, Nguyen Thao Trang, Ngo Xuan Hieu, Hoang Tien Dat, Dao Xuan Phuong, Do Ngoc Son
Language: English
Subfield: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,690
OpenAlex ID: W4416818237
