Year: 2025
Type: editorial
Abstract: In my commentary, I focus on Ostaric’s account of the relation between the faculty of reflective judgment and empirical reality. She emphasizes, correctly, that the purposiveness at issue in the third Critique is a purposiveness of nature. I consider whether Ostaric’s “moral image realism” can connect reflective judgment to nature in a truly realist fashion, and argue that it cannot.
Source: Croatian Journal of Philosophy
DOI: 10.52685/cjp.25.74.4
Author: Ted Kinnamann
Institution: George Mason University
Language: English
Subfield: Philosophy
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W4416901140
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
