Work

Utility of Self-Rated vs. Informant-Rated Ascertain Dementia-8 for Detection of Early Cognitive Impairment: Experience of a “Real-World” Memory Clinic

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire (AD8) is a validated informant-based interview for early dementia detection. Research suggests the utility of self-rated AD8 to identify milder dementia forms in research settings. This study compares the factor structure, reliability, and diagnostic performance between AD8-Self and AD8-Informant for early cognitive impairment (ECI) in a clinical setting. METHODS: Five hundreds fifteen patient-informant dyads (43 cognitively intact and 472 ECI) from a tertiary memory clinic completed both self-reported and informant AD8. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine the factor structure, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for ECI, including a subgroup analysis for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). RESULTS: The mean age and education of ECI participants were 75.61 years (range, 51-95) and 5.6 years (range, 0-20), respectively, and 72.6 years (range, 51-89) and 6.8 years (range, 0-16) in the MCI subgroup. Unlike AD8-Informant's one-factor structure, AD8-Self had a two-factor structure corresponding to memory and non-memory domains. AD8-Self demonstrated lower reliability (Cronbach's alpha: ECI 0.666 vs. 0.764; MCI 0.663 vs. 0.709). In ECI, AD8-Informant (cutoff score ≥3) showed better diagnostic performance (sensitivity 89%, specificity 79%) than AD8-Self (cutoff score ≥4; sensitivity 27.1%, specificity 95.3%) (AUC 0.915 vs. 0.593; p<0.001). Similar results were found in MCI (sensitivity 64.7% vs. 26.5%; specificity 79.1% vs. 95.3%; AUC 0.745 vs. 0.600; p=0.002). CONCLUSION: AD8-Self has a distinct factor structure, lower reliability, and inferior diagnostic performance compared to AD8-Informant for ECI/MCI detection. Our result do not support AD8-Self as a standalone tool for detecting ECI or MCI.

Source: Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research

DOI: 10.4235/agmr.25.0082