Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This paper reinterprets Michel Foucault’s Panopticon in the context of AI-enabled surveillance, arguing that algorithmic monitoring now disciplines citizens through pervasive, opaque, and normalized forms of control. While such systems pose a direct threat to democratic freedoms, their global diffusion—evident from China’s practices in Xinjiang to predictive policing and spyware elsewhere—demands proactive and accountable governance. I contend that coordinated export controls, coupled with NGO-led exposure and strategic litigation, form an essential counter-disciplinary framework. Together, these mechanisms constrain abusive surveillance, strengthen democratic oversight, and enable citizens to resist becoming the docile bodies of an increasingly automated surveillance order.
Author: Hninn Thanlwin Thit
Institution: University of Bologna
Language: English
Subfield: Safety Research
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W4416994489
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: