Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Across the world, scholars, communities and courts are increasingly debating whether rivers should be recognized as ‘legal entities’ — entitled to rights and protection. Proponents argue that such recognition helps reframe river management and governance from sectoral and short-term to more holistic integrating hydrological processes, ecosystems, and socio-cultural relationships. Critics warn of legal uncertainty, enforcement difficulties and perverse administrative consequences. This paper surveys the historical and cultural roots of the rights-of-nature idea, reviews landmark legal instances where rivers or ecosystems have been granted rights or personhood, assesses the present state of practice and jurisprudence, identifies future challenges (legal, institutional, scientific and social), and proposes a pragmatic set of requirements and institutional pathways to establish resilient river rights that can improve river health while addressing concerns of governance, liability and social justice. The paper builds upon jurisprudence, statutory models and scholarly literature to propose eight set of river rights. Where legal examples are cited (Ecuador, Colombia, New Zealand, India), primary judgments and statutes and scholarly analyses have been examined to inform recommendations. The paper concludes that legal landscape of river rights is evolving and varies by jurisdiction; therefore, local constitutional and statutory constraints must be carefully analyzed when designing rights regimes.
DOI: 10.64252/c9zygp70
Authors: Anil Garg, Ashok K Singh, Venkatesh Dutta
Language: English
Topic: Environmental law and policy
Subfield: Law
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W4417265034