The fourth industrial revolution (4th IR): a theoretical critique of the discourse
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Fourth Industrial Revolution (4th IR) is today's buzzword around the world. In almost every space, be it in intellectual seminars, corridor conversations, corporate boardrooms, at conferences, in parliaments; no discussion ends without a mention of this word. It has been championed by Klaus Schwab, who during his presentation at the 2015 World Economic Forum (WEF) argued that the 4th IR will fundamentally alter the world, and thus warrants strategic responses to both optimise the opportunities it presents as well as guarding against its likely undesirable consequences for humanity. This article advances a theoretical critique of this discourse as popularised by Schwab and his adherents. This critique rests on theoretical frameworks that were used to explicate past major historical transitions, specifically transition from feudalism to industrial capitalism. Exposing serious theoretical shortfalls within the 4th IR discourse, I conclude that the claims made about it and its likely impact on societies are less convincing as they fail to provide a comprehensive account of the nature of changes i.e. whether they signify a social system that is radically different from the pre-existing one or simply innovations within the present system, and the factors behind them (a technologically determinist account that characterise the discourse is clearly inadequate). I propose that for a better account and grasp of the evident technological innovations witnessed today and wrongfully termed the forth industrial revolution, which should inform strategic responses thereto; an in-depth qualitative analysis located within the context of long wave theories of change is necessary. Such analysis would enable us to address, as I argue in this article, a range of important and relevant questions such as: whether or not there are any continuities or complete break with the pre-existing social order?, and the underlying set of factors and not just a single factor influencing change.
Source: Figshare
DOI: 10.14749/28650173
Author: Human Sciences Research Council
Language: English
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
Funder: Human Sciences Research Council
OpenAlex ID: W6886098634
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: