A LLM-Powered Automatic Grading Framework with Human-Level Guidelines Optimization
Year: 2025
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: Open-text responses provide researchers and educators with rich, nuanced insights that multiple-choice questions cannot capture. When reliably assessed, such responses have the potential to enhance teaching and learning. However, scaling and consistently capturing these nuances remain significant challenges, limiting the widespread use of open-text questions in educational research and assessments. In this paper, we introduce and evaluate GradeOpt, a unified multiagent automatic short-answer grading (ASAG) framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) as graders for short-answer responses. More importantly, GradeOpt incorporates two additional LLM-based agents—the reflector and the refiner—into the multi-agent system. This enables GradeOpt to automatically optimize the original grading guidelines by performing self-reflection on its errors. To assess GradeOpt's effectiveness, we conducted experiments on two representative ASAG datasets, which include items designed to capture key aspects of teachers' pedagogical knowledge and students' learning progress. Our results demonstrate that GradeOpt consistently outperforms representative baselines in both grading accuracy and alignment with human evaluators across different knowledge domains. Finally, comprehensive ablation studies validate the contributions of GradeOpt's individual components, confirming their impact on overall performance.
Authors: Yucheng Chu, Hang Li, Kaiqi Yang, Harry Shomer, Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, Leonora Kaldaras, Kevin Haudek, Joseph Krajcik, Namsoo Shin, Hui Liu, Jiliang Tang
Language: English
Subfield: Information Systems
Field: Computer Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
SDG: Quality education
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W6912160608