Untangling Attention Bias from Emotion: A Double-blind Randomized Experiment with Individuals with Social Anxiety
Year: 2015
Type: conference-paper
Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial
Abstract: Background: Uncertainty abounds regarding the putative mechanisms of attention bias modification (ABM). Although early studies showed that ABM reduced anxiety proneness more than control procedures lacking a contingency between cues and probes, recent work suggests that the later just performed as well as the former did. In this experiment, we investigated a non-emotional mechanism that may play a role in ABM. Methods: We randomly assigned 62 individuals with a DSM-IV diagnosis of social anxiety disorder to a single-session of either a non-emotional contingency training, non-emotional no-contingency training, or control condition controlling for potential practice effects. Working memory capacity and anxiety reactivity to a speech challenge were assessed before and after training. Results: Consistent with the hypothesis of a practice effect, the three groups likewise reported indistinguishably significant improvement in self-report and behavioural measures of speech anxiety as well as in working memory. Repeating the speech task twice may have had anxioltyic benefits. Limitations: The temporal separation between baseline and post-training assessment as well as the scope of the training sessions could be extended. Conclusions: The current findings are at odds with the hypothesis that ABM is effective because of the presence of a contingency between cues and probes. They also show the importance of including a credible additional condition controlling for practice effects.
Authors: Coussement, Charlotte, Richard J. McNally, Heeren, Alexandre, Annual Meeting of the Belgian Association for Psychological Sciences
Language: English
Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7006554154