Mind, Nature, and Religious Experience in William James and Carl Gustav Jung
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This paper examines how William James (1842-1910) and Carl Gustav Jung (1875-1961) developed fundamentally different philosophical frameworks for understanding consciousness, nature, and religious experience. Through close textual analysis of primary sources and engagement with recent historiographical debates, this study demonstrates that James's evolution from "supernaturalist" phenomenology to religious naturalism grounded in radical empiricism differs fundamentally from Jung's psycho-epistemological framework emphasizing archetypal structures. The analysis reveals how their divergent ontological commitments—James's neutral monism versus Jung's careful distinction between psychological and metaphysical reality—led to distinct methodological approaches to religious phenomena. James evaluated religious experiences pragmatically for their transformative "fruits," while Jung interpreted them as symbolic expressions of individuation processes. These findings contribute to understanding how early psychology navigated between scientific materialism and religious phenomena, offering insights relevant to contemporary consciousness studies. Rather than imposing anachronistic categories, this historically grounded analysis clarifies both thinkers' actual positions while exploring their enduring significance for psychology and philosophy of mind.
Source: Review of General Psychology
Author: Luiz Henrique, Santana
Language: English
Subfield: Social Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,900
OpenAlex ID: W7083587378
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: