Year: 2010
Type: editorial
Abstract: Problem solved or a Pandora’s box? For at least a generation there has been a divergence of opinions about gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). On one hand were those who, on the basis of largely observational studies in humans and extrapolation of animal data, felt that women should be tested for GDM and have their diagnosed GDM treated. On the other hand, there were the “obskeptics” who felt that no significant action should be taken until evidence of benefits and risks was available. Clinicians of either persuasion undoubtedly have found developments over the last few years most
Source: Diabetes Care
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-2306
Author: Robert G. Moses
Institution: South Eastern Sydney Local Health District
Language: English
Subfield: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W2117412924