Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: ABSTRACT Composite endpoints are increasingly used in clinical trials to capture treatment effects across multiple or hierarchically ordered outcomes. Although inference procedures based on win statistics—such as the win ratio, win odds, and win difference (net benefit)—have gained traction in individually randomized trials, their methodological development for cluster‐randomized trials remains limited. In particular, there is no formal framework for power and sample size determination when using win statistics with composite time‐to‐event outcomes. We develop a unified framework for power and sample size calculation for win statistics under cluster randomization. Analytical variance expressions are derived for a class of win statistics, yielding closed‐form variance expressions and power procedures that avoid computationally intensive simulations. The variance expressions explicitly characterize the roles of the rank intracluster correlation coefficient, cluster size, tie probability, and outcome prioritization for study planning purposes. Importantly, our variances nest existing formulas for univariate outcomes as special cases while extending them to complex, hierarchically ordered composite endpoints. Simulation studies confirm accurate finite‐sample performance, and we supply a case study to illustrate the use of our proposed method.
DOI: 10.1111/sjos.70099
Authors: Xi Fang, Zhiqiang Cao, Fan Li
Language: English
Subfield: Statistics and Probability
Field: Mathematics
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: green
Award: G4274820608
OpenAlex ID: W7101832537
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: