Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: ABSTRACT Introduction The control of the invasive red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) at Booderee National Park (BNP) is one of Australia's longest running predator management programs. A prevailing narrative is that a large and sustained reduction of fox abundance at BNP has triggered complex ecological cascades. Aim To critically assess the strength of the evidence base underpinning the prevailing narrative of a large and sustained reduction in fox abundance at BNP. Methods We collated and reviewed the existing data on fox abundance at BNP. Results An overlooked methodological change has inflated the perceived ongoing suppression of fox abundance at BNP. Data indicating a reduction in fox abundance are constrained to the first half of the program (i.e., 1999–2011) and remain uncertain in terms of fox population size and/or impact. Discussion Evidence of sustained fox abundance reduction at BNP is not as robust as previously thought. We discuss the implications of this new perspective on research and management efforts at BNP. In doing so, we are not suggesting that fox control has been ineffective at BNP, we are highlighting the need to bolster our understanding of fox population size and impact, and the effectiveness of control operations with robust data. Conclusion Data biases can influence the perceived effectiveness of long‐term management programs, and hence our capacity for adaptive management. We emphasise the importance of consistency in the design and practice of data collection, and the value of periodic review of long‐term conservation management efforts.
Source: Mammal Review
DOI: 10.1111/mam.70019
Authors: Hugh F. Davies, Paul D. Meek
Language: English
Subfield: Ecology
Field: Environmental Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
SDG: Life on land
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,100
OpenAlex ID: W7116708789