Work

Threatened and Emotional: U.S. Host Nationals’ Perceived Threats, Perceived Benefits, and Intergroup Emotions Toward Different Types of Migrants

Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: The present study was conducted to ascertain how liberal, moderate, and conservative U.S. host nationals would endorse threats and benefits from different migrant groups, as well as positive and negative emotions toward these groups. A sample of 1,292 U.S. voters responded to prompts referring to threats, benefits, and positive and negative emotions vis-à-vis eight migrant groups. Conservatives perceived the greatest threats, and the least benefits, across migrant groups. Liberals were most emotionally variable, whereas conservatives were the least, for all groups. Liberals reported high compassion across migrant groups, and conservatives reported moderate anger across migrant groups.
Language: English
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W7116769945
FWCI:
Cites: 53
Cited by:
Related to: