Protocol-Level Execution Authorization Anchor (Formal Non-Bypassable Control of Execution)
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Description (Canonical, Anchor-Aligned) This document defines a protocol-level execution authorization anchor whose sole purpose is to make the permissibility of execution externally verifiable and non-bypassable. The anchor formalizes architectural axioms and invariants under which execution is impossible by definition without an explicit external authorization decision. It establishes a deterministic linkage between authorization and execution outcome, independent of business logic, policy interpretation, model internals, or operational discretion. The document specifies a logically external Authorization Decision Point (ADP), a canonical execution trace, and a set of invariants and failure modes that together define non-bypassable control of execution at the protocol level. These elements are architectural constraints, not policy statements. This document is a formal anchor for governance-grade verification, audit, and liability analysis.It is not a standard and does not prescribe implementation. This record is strictly referential and non-operational.It introduces no standards, implementations, protocols, policy guidance, or compliance requirements. This record: provides no legal advice; makes no policy recommendations; provides no implementation or operational guidance; asserts no factual claims about any real-world incident; makes no claims regarding safety, alignment, performance, or ethics beyond execution control. Any interpretation beyond the literal text of this record is not authorized without explicit written consent of the author. License and use notice: This artifact is released under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. It may be read, cited, linked, and referenced with attribution. No commercial use, modified versions, derivative specifications, operational claims, service claims, or implied endorsement are granted by this publication. No implementation, operational, commercial, licensing, evaluation, conformity, equivalence, endorsement, or authoritative interpretation rights are granted by this publication. Any such use requires separate written permission from the author. Licensing and interpretation framework: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18381146 Current clarification version: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19846720
Author: Independent Researcher
Language: English
Topic: Access Control and Trust
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7116868640
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: