Does Neighborhood Disadvantage Moderate the Relationship between Apolipoprotein E Status and Cognitive Functioning?
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background Research is inconclusive about the relationship between Apolipoprotein E (APOE) status and cognition, especially among APOE4 (ε4) heterozygotes. Environmental factors like neighborhood disadvantage are also associated with cognitive decline, however, few studies have integrated this with APOE research. This study seeks to address the gaps in literature by examining whether neighborhood disadvantage, defined by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), moderates the relationship between APOE4 status and cognition. Method This is a cross‐sectional analysis of data from the Connecticut Alzheimer's Disease Research Center ( N = 190). Participants diagnosed with dementia or with two ε4 alleles were excluded. Adults over 50 years old (53.7% Female; M education =16.6 ± 2.56; 80.5% Non‐Hispanic White) ( M age =72.6 ± 7.19) were cognitively healthy (62.6%) or diagnosed with MCI (37.4%). Participants completed a neuropsychological workup as part of their annual evaluation. Neuropsychological measures were grouped theoretically into attention, language, speed and executive function, memory, and visuospatial domains. Confirmatory factory analysis (CFA) was utilized to assure suitability to domains. Multiple linear regressions were used to evaluate main effects and interactions. Result CFA results supported the domain groupings (Χ 2 (34)=95.395, p < .001; RMSEA = 0.080 [90% CI=0.062, 0.100]; CFI = 0.952; TLI = 0.922). Each linear regression included the following predictors and covariates: APOE status, ADI, ADI*APOE interaction, sex, race, education, age, and hypercholesterolemia. Only memory and attention domains met normality assumptions and neither the overall model for memory ( R 2 = 0.17, F (10, 75)=1.48, p = .163) or attention ( R 2 = 0.16, F (10, 75)=1.40, p = .199) were statically significant. APOE status was not a significant predictor for performance on memory ( β = ‐0.36, p = .430) or attention ( β = 0.52, p = .265) measures. ADI was not a significant predictor for performance on memory ( β = 0.15, p = .593) or attention (β=0.24, p = .414) measures. The APOE*ADI interaction was not significant for measures of memory ( β = ‐0.12, p = .486) or attention ( β = ‐0.14, p = .429). Conclusion In our subsample of participants, ADI did not moderate the relationship between APOE status and performance on attention or memory measures. However, research demonstrates a relationship between environmental factors and cognitive decline. Some factors remain modifiable, on an individual and policy level, and in order to shift towards a preventative rather than reactive care model, it is imperative to continue to explore modifiable risk factors (e.g., social determinants of health) that impact cognition.
Source: Alzheimer s & Dementia
Institutions: Yale University, University of Florida
Language: English
Subfield: Psychiatry and Mental health
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $4,200
OpenAlex ID: W7117314871
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: