Work

Systemic risks and cascading dynamics in the global cobalt supply chain

Year: 2025

Type: article

Abstract: The global transition to low-carbon technologies hinges on secure supplies of critical minerals like cobalt, yet interconnected supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to geopolitical tensions and frequent external disruptions. Existing risk assessments often treat commodities in isolation, overlooking the upstream–downstream dependencies that amplify cascading failures. Here we show systemic risks in global cobalt flows from 1998 to 2019 across 230 countries and regions by integrating trade-linked material flow analysis with a multilayer shock propagation model. Our results reveal that disruptions propagate through alternating horizontal–vertical and direct–indirect pathways, with risk concentrating at the mining stage but accumulating predominantly in refining–manufacturing bridges. These cascades yield abrupt nonlinear failures and an avalanche network four times denser than the underlying physical supply chain. Nations with low systemic fragility but high exposure rate—such as Indonesia, South Africa, and Mexico—are particularly susceptible to common random disruptions and lack resilience or effective response. Over the past two decades, global systemic risks have followed a volatile but upward trend. These findings highlight that national mitigation measures are necessary but insufficient; achieving resilience requires stage-aware, system-level coordination and multilateral cooperation. • Traced cobalt flows across 230 nations and 6 stages (1998–2019) using integrated MFA and multilayer networks. • Risk accumulates in refining–manufacturing bridges, yielding an avalanche network 4× denser than the supply chain. • Disruptions cascade via alternating horizontal–vertical and direct–indirect pathways, producing abrupt and nonlinear failures. • Low-fragility, high-exposure nations are vulnerable to disruptions and lack resilience. • Rising risks necessitates stage-aware, multilateral coordination to ensure global supply chain resilience.

Source: Environmental Science and Ecotechnology

DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100654