‘Publish or Perish!’: perception and self-appraisal of Indian physicians on academic publications: A cross-sectional study
Year: 2025
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Background: Research and academic publications are crucial for Indian physicians' professional growth, evidence generation, and academic advancement. It often contributes to the "publish or perish" culture. This study aims to assess Indian physicians' perceptions and self-appraisal on academic publications, for those practicing evidence-based medicine (EBM). Methodology: A cross-sectional online survey with proper consent was conducted over two months, targeting Indian physicians practicing EBM to evaluate their views on research and publications. Results: A total of 320 physicians participated (mean age 41.15 ± 8.94 years; 68.8% male). Most held post-graduate degrees (73.4%) and worked in government-run institutions (56.6%). A large proportion (88.7%) had prior publications, with a preference for PubMed/Medline-indexed journals (40.0%). Sixty-five percent balanced clinical and academic roles. Physicians were motivated by career advancement (31.6%) and professional recognition (34.7%). Behavioral patterns showed "addiction-like" tendencies, with many frequently checking publication metrics and tracking manuscript progress. Physicians with post-graduate qualifications, particularly in medicine, were more engaged in these behaviors. Those in central government teaching institutions showed even greater engagement. Conclusion: This study reveals the complex dynamics of academic publishing among Indian physicians, highlighting the pressures of the "publish or perish" culture. Institutions should focus on fostering quality over quantity in publishing, providing mentorship, and promoting ethical practices to mitigate these pressures.
Source: PubMed
Language: English
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7117644528
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: