Monotonicity among Judges: Evidence from Judicial Panels and Consequences for Judge IV Designs
Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: Judge IV designs rely on monotonicity—each judge being weakly stricter than more lenient judges in all cases. I measure monotonicity in judicial panels in five different settings and find that it is violated in up to 50 percent of nonunanimous cases. The monotonicity violations are not detected by conventional tests, but they would typically induce little bias in judge IV estimates. (JEL C26, K41, K42, O17)
Source: American Economic Review
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20231104
Author: Henrik Sigstad
Institution: BI Norwegian Business School
Language: English
Subfield: Economics and Econometrics
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7117670261