Agile Ethics: AI Governance Debate Case Study
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: I have then been picturing a classroom debate about government regulation in AI. I think that this would appeal to my audience of mostly engineering majors. Over the summer in the AI4ALL summer camp, Dr Steven Kelts led a great ethics debate with the students, and I am hoping to emulate that by partitioning the SML 301 students into 4 roles such as congressional staffers business lobbyists data privacy NGO legal advisors I want to give each student a one-page character sheet to on-board them into the roles (stated above). I hope that each character sheet provides several possible talking points to encourage and guide the debate. Even after I read some materials (below in the “RAG” section), I find that I myself am not a writer of debates. Thus, I shall employ prompt engineering to create the bullet-point lists of talking points. The idea of debate roles lends itself well for the prompt engineering tool.
Source: QUBES
DOI: 10.25334/c3vz-yr02
Author: Sollberger, Derek
Institution: Princeton University
Language: English
Subfield: Education
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7119123132
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: