Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Introduction Mental health challenges have been recognized as factors that can influence sport officials’ ability to perform effectively. For example, 90% of soccer officials believed common mental disorders could negatively affect refereeing performance. Therefore, this study aimed to uncover if mental health affects officiating performance. Methods This study used a subjective rating of officiating performance (e.g., positioning, rule application, communication, etc.) and measures of mental health outcomes using the Kessler K10 psychological distress scale and the Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale to determine the relationship between mental health and performance. A sample of 274 referees (85% male, 84% Caucasian, M age = 47.3, M experience = 19.0) from Canada Basketball participated in this study. Results A Hierarchical Linear Regression predicting performance from psychological distress and wellbeing, after controlling for experience, was significant [ F (3, 235) = 22.60, p < 0.001], accounting for 19% of the variation in officials’ performance. Discussion This study demonstrates that the wellbeing of sport officials is a significant predictor of perceived performance, whereas psychological distress does not appear to directly influence performance.
Source: Frontiers in Psychology
Authors: Nate Taylor, David Hancock, Philip Sullivan
Institutions: Brock University, Memorial University of Newfoundland
Language: English
Subfield: Developmental and Educational Psychology
Field: Psychology
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
Award: G6872769595
OpenAlex ID: W7119181616