Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Missing, inaccurate, or poorly documented data in healthcare is often treated as a technical problem to be statistically resolved via imputation, deletion, or modeling assumptions about randomness. However, such inaccuracies relate to far more complex socioeconomic and geopolitical issues, rather than "errors of data entry" to be ameliorated with statistical modeling techniques. We outline that what is really missing or inaccurate is the context in which the data is collected-and that only by understanding this context can we begin to prevent artificial intelligence's (AIs) amplification of misleading, decontextualized data. We critically examine how traditional modeling methods fail to account for the factors that influence what data gets recorded, and for whom. We show how AI systems trained on decontextualized data reinforce health inequities at scale. And, we review recent literature on context-aware approaches to understanding data, that incorporate metadata, social determinants of health, fairness constraints, and participatory governance to build more ethical and representative systems. Our analysis urges the AI and healthcare communities to move beyond the traditional emphasis on statistical convenience, toward socially grounded and interdisciplinary strategies for handling decontextualized data.
Source: PLOS Digital Health
Institutions: New York University Abu Dhabi, Universidade de São Paulo, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Mons, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Language: English
Subfield: Safety Research
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,043
OpenAlex ID: W7123539947