Year: 2026
Type: preprint
Abstract: Academic freedom is imperative to evidence-based public policy. Yet the mechanisms by which donor influence, political governance, and control of data infrastructure reshape what counts as ‘evidence’ remain underexplored. This essay draws distinctions between documented interventions (e.g. contractual leverage over hiring or publication) and incentive-driven distortions (e.g. agenda-setting and selective visibility), and treats evidence production as an end-to-end pipeline, from agenda-setting and data access to dissemination and correction. We explore the intentional production or maintenance of contestable facts that keep consequential claims arguable rather than testable. We illustrate the framework with criminal justice, a stress test domain where coercive state power, constitutional constraints, and life-or-death consequences heighten incentives to manage evidence. The essay concludes with a research agenda and safeguards that generalize across policy areas while accounting for the legal and ethical constraints of criminal justice data.
Source: CrimRxiv
Authors: Thaddeus L. Johnson, Natasha N. Johnson
Language: English
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7123567374
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: