Work

Qualification and explanation in the dynamical/geometrical debate

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: We consider the distinction between ‘qualified’ and ‘unqualified’ approaches introduced by Read (2020a) in the context of the dynamical/geometrical debate. We show that one fruitful way in which to understand this distinction is in terms of what one takes the kinematically possible models of a given theory to represent; moreover, we show that the qualified/unqualified distinction is applicable not only to the geometrical approach (which is the case considered by Read (2020a)), but also to the dynamical approach. Finally, having made these points, we connect them to other discussions of representation and of explanation in this corner of the literature.

Source: European Journal for Philosophy of Science

DOI: 10.1007/s13194-025-00716-7

Authors: Pablo Acuña, James Read

Institutions: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, University of Oxford

Language: English

Topic: Philosophy and History of Science

Subfield: History and Philosophy of Science

Field: Arts and Humanities

Domain: Social Sciences

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $2,190

Funder: Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung