Year: 2025
Type: article
Abstract: This paper argues that "problematic" or "inconvenient" sonata-rondo movements lacking clear recapitulations, such as Haydn's "Clock" symphony finale, should be defined neither negatively (as a flawed or "lesser" sonata-rondo form) nor experientially (as a midstream conversion from Type 4 to rondo), but rather as descendants of the expositional rondo that originated in finales as early as the 1760s in pieces by Mozart, Joseph and Michael Haydn, J.C. Bach, and Joseph Bologne, the Chevalier St. Georges.Their first couplet-episode (AB) pair forms a sonata exposition (by Galant standards, using Burstein's (2020) recently revived Kochian terms such as Grundabsätze and Quintabsätze, as well as the Modulating Prinner), and then proceeds to the standard couplet-episode (AC, AD, etc.) layout until complete; the expositional materials never return.As the generic norms of their sonata forms began to take shape in the 1770s, both Mozart and Haydn began to add a section late in the pieces, perhaps to compensate for the lack of the return of expositional materials, a section I label a "balancing" section.This article proposes that the expositional rondo was not "redundant" or "lesser"-terms that have been used to describe problematic finales that defied easy identification-but rather an option that composers often utilized while sonata and rondo forms were beginning to crystallize.Furthermore, these expositional rondos will provide a fresh approach to finales in the following decades, concluding with detailed examinations of "inconvenient" finales, most notably the finales of Haydn's London Symphonies, notorious for their ambiguous formal layouts.
Source: Music Theory Online
DOI: 10.30535/mto.31.3.3
Author: Graham Hunt
Institution: The University of Texas at Arlington
Language: English
Subfield: Music
Field: Arts and Humanities
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W7124583351
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: