The clinical benefit of a near complete cytoreduction in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases: a propensity score matched study
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (PM) presents a significant therapeutic challenge. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is one option to prolong survival. While completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score 0 is associated with improved outcomes, the clinical value of near-complete CC-score 1 versus open-close laparotomy (CC-3) remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluates overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal cancer PM scheduled for CRS and HIPEC from 23 global peritoneal-surface oncology centers from 2006 to 2023. A propensity score matching was performed using tumor location (colon/rectum), lymph node status, liver metastases, signet-ring histology, preoperative chemotherapy, peritoneal cancer index, and treatment year. Matching was performed using the nearest neighbor method with a caliper of 0.1, chosen after several iterations to optimize intergroup balance. Balance was assessed using standardized mean differences. Sensitivity analyses with alternative calipers and multivariable Cox regression in the unmatched cohort were considered to test the robustness of the findings. The study time-period was divided into 4 equal quartiles for analysis. RESULTS: In the unmatched cohort (n = 284), patients with CC-1 had significantly longer median OS compared to those with CC-3 (22.2 vs. 9.4 months, p < 0.001). After 1:1 matching (n = 172), the OS advantage of CC-1 persisted, with a median OS of 18.9 months (95 % CI: 14.2-24.7) versus 10.5 months (95 % CI: 9.4-12.3) for CC-3, p < 0.0001, HR 0.4 (95 % CI:0.27-0.56). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed CC-1 as a significant predictor of survival (HR: 0.15, 95 % CI: 0.08-0.26). The CC-1 proportion went from 55 to 65 % in time-periods 1 & 2-39 % in period 3, to 11 % in period 4; leading to significantly reduced survival rates in the latter time-periods 3 & 4. DISCUSSION: Near complete cytoreduction is associated with improved overall survival compared to open-close laparotomy. Prospective or standardized multicenter analyses will be required to confirm the clinical value of a near complete cytoreduction.
Authors: Peter H. Cashin, David Morris, Jesus Esquivel, Stein Gunnar Larsen, Heikki Takala, Frédéric Dumont, Isabelle Sourrouille, Vahan Kepenekian, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Jean-Marc Bereder, Pablo Ortega-Deballon, Karine Abboud, Jean-Marc Regimbeau, Olivia Sgarbura, Olivier Glehen, Brice Paquette, Pascale Mariani, Romuald Wernert, Jeremie H. Lefevre, Catherine Arvieux, Clarisse Eveno, Denis Pezet, Reza Kianmanesh, Abdel Taibi, Cécile Brigand, Jean-Marc Guilloit
Institutions: Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, UNSW Sydney, St George Hospital, Beebe Healthcare, Beebe Healthcare, Oslo University Hospital, Oulu University Hospital, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Institut Gustave Roussy, Lyon 1 Université, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Centre pour l'innovation en cancérologie de Lyon, Hôpital Charles-Nicolle, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, Inserm, Université de Montpellier, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, Institut Curie, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, Hôpital Universitaire Dupuytren, Hôpital d'Hautepierre, Centre François Baclesse
Language: English
Subfield: Surgery
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $3,810
Funder: Cancerfonden
Award: G2885408
OpenAlex ID: W7125397291
