Work

Effects of Over-the-Counter Whitening Products on Microhardness, Gloss Retention, and Surface Roughness of Z350 XT Universal Restorative Composite Resin

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Objectives: This study investigated the effects of three over-the-counter (OTC) whitening products, whitening pen (WP, Dazzling White Instant Whitening Pen, Dazzling White, Grand Rapids, MI, USA), whitening mouthwash (MW, Colgate Optic White, Colgate-Palmolive, New York, NY, USA), and whitening toothpaste (TP, Crest 3D White, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH, USA), on the microhardness, gloss retention, and surface roughness of a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT Universal Restorative, 3M ESPE). Methods: Composite resin specimens were prepared and subjected to treatment with WP, MW, or TP. Microhardness, gloss retention, and surface roughness were measured before and after treatment. Data were subjected to statistical analysis, with normality assessed by Shapiro–Wilk testing. Parametric data were summarized as mean ± SD, and differences were evaluated using paired t-tests and one-way ANOVA with a significance level of p ≤ 0. 05. Results: All whitening products significantly altered the tested surface properties. Microhardness decreased in all groups (MD [95% CI]: 2.28 [1.84–2.71] for WP, 5.05 [4.22–5.88] for MW, and 3.09 [2.35–3.83] for TP; p < 0.001), with the greatest reduction observed in the MW group. Gloss retention also declined significantly (MD [95% CI]: 9.52 [6.28–12.76] for WP, 17.97 [14.92–21.01] for MW, and 18.92 [15.64–22.21] for TP; p < 0.001), with TP and MW showing greater loss compared to WP. Surface roughness increased significantly within each group (MD [95% CI]: −0.07 [–0.10 to −0.04] for WP, −0.23 [–0.30 to −0.16] for MW, and −0.25 [–0.38 to −0.13] for TP; p < 0.001), although no significant differences were found among groups in post-treatment values. Conclusions: OTC whitening products adversely affected the optical and mechanical properties of Z350 XT universal composite resin. Whitening MW caused the most pronounced microhardness reduction, while MW and TP induced greater gloss loss than WP. Clinicians should consider the potential impact of whitening products on resin composite restorations when advising patients on their use.

Source: Prosthesis

DOI: 10.3390/prosthesis8010012