Work

Ecological Momentary Intervention for Memory in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury: Findings From a Mixed-Methods Pilot and Feasibility Study

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine acceptability and feasibility of a technology-delivered memory assessment and intervention tool (MEMI, memory ecological momentary intervention) and its intended delivery schedule for adults with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). MEMI introduces new information, cues retrieval, and assesses learning via text messages. SETTING: Community sample from Vanderbilt Brain Injury Patient Registry in Nashville, TN, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 20 adults with chronic, moderate-severe TBI and 20 non-injured comparison (NC) participants matched on age, sex, and education. DESIGN: In this crossover study, participants used MEMI for two weeks: one in which they completed all learning in a single session to approximate standard memory rehabilitation (Blocked schedule) and one in which retrievals were spaced in short, twice-daily sessions (Spaced, intended delivery schedule). MAIN MEASURES: The primary pilot outcomes were feasibility (session engagement) and acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure). In a preliminary analysis, we also assessed delayed free recall of trained information. We also report supplementary data on participant surveys and cued recall. RESULTS: Participants in both groups were highly engaged and rated the tool as acceptable. On average, the TBI group rated acceptability of the Spaced schedule higher than the Blocked schedule. Both groups remembered more words at the end of the week in the Spaced schedule (TBI: t (17) = 4.37, p <.001, 95% CI [2.79, 7.99]; NC: t (19) = 8.57, p <.001, 95% CI[5.13, 8.46]). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, spaced retrieval via MEMI was feasible and acceptable for adults with chronic TBI. MEMI has potential as a memory assessment and intervention tool in both therapeutic and research contexts. Future work should include a larger trial to assess MEMI's efficacy, clinical utility, individual differences, and personalizing content.

Source: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000001147

Authors: Emily L. Morrow, Lyndsay A. Nelson, Melissa C. Duff, Lindsay S. Mayberry

Institutions: Vanderbilt University, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Language: English

Topic: Cognitive Functions and Memory

Subfield: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Field: Psychology

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: hybrid

Funders: American Speech-Language-Hearing Foundation, Vanderbilt University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences