Marked Impact of Regulatory Bans on Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde‐Releaser‐Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study (1996–2024) From Turkey
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Formaldehyde (FA) and formaldehyde-releasers (FRs) are well-known causes of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Following the 2019 EU ban on FA and Quaternium-15 in cosmetics, stable or slightly decreasing sensitisation rates have been reported. In Turkey, both were banned in 2021. OBJECTIVES: To assess FA/FR sensitisation and ACD rates before and after the ban, and evaluate the role of FA as a marker for FR allergy. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort of 2592 patients patch tested with FA 1% or 2% aq. and at least one FR between 1996 and 2024. RESULTS: FA/FRs sensitisation prevalence was 1.9% (48/2592), mostly in patients > 40 years old. The most frequent sensitisers were hexahydro-1,3,5-tris-(2-hydroxyethyl)triazine (0.7%) and Quaternium-15 (0.6%). ACD occurred in 37.5% (18/48), mainly as hand eczema from non-occupational rinse-off cosmetics, while 16.7% were occupational (hairdressers/barbers/metalworkers). FA 1%-2% aq. failed to detect FR sensitisation in 31.9% (n = 15/47) of patients, including nine missed with FA 1% aq. and six with FA 2% aq. No cases occurred after the 2021 ban. 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol and DMDM-hydantoin showed no co-reactivity with FA, but were important inducers of FR-related ACD. CONCLUSIONS: The 2021 ban in Turkey appears to have reduced ACD due to FA and FRs. Continued FR testing remains essential, as FA 2% aq. is complementary but not a fully reliable marker.
Source: Contact Dermatitis
DOI: 10.1111/cod.70104
Authors: Esen Özkaya, Ömer Mangır, Elizaveta Ayas
Institution: Istanbul University
Language: English
Subfield: Dermatology
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: bronze
OpenAlex ID: W7128699899