Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: As the negative impacts of rapidly accelerating climate change increase in frequency and severity, widespread climate action in the population becomes increasingly urgent. The need for population-wide climate action and behavior change represents a significant psychological challenge that may be addressed through psychologically informed interventions. The current study investigates whether and how much 10 incidental state emotions (fear, dread, hope, anger, sadness, distress, worry, guilt, shame, and helplessness) contribute to climate change belief, climate policy support, and climate action in participants from the UK ( N = 418). We report that greater fear and lower dread predict greater climate policy support, with no other state emotions predicting climate policy support. State emotions did not predict climate change belief or climate action. Our findings indicate that feeling fear, but not dread, may be important for climate policy support, yet such emotions may not translate into climate action. We discuss possible explanations for non-significant findings, such as a ceiling effect in climate change belief. Overall, our study uniquely explores the contributions of multiple incidental state emotions to climate action, indicating that nuanced differences in state emotions (e.g., fear vs. dread) may lead to different impacts on climate policy support.
Source: Frontiers in Psychology
Institution: Anglia Ruskin University
Language: English
Subfield: Sociology and Political Science
Field: Social Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Climate action
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
Funder: Anglia Ruskin University
OpenAlex ID: W7128711458
