Work

Patient representatives’ perspectives on the centralisation of inpatient healthcare services - A focus group study in Germany

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Centralisation, i.e. the reorganisation of inpatient healthcare services into fewer specialised units serving a higher volume of patients, affects patients in numerous ways. However, patient representatives' perspectives on centralisation have hardly been explored. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at eliciting patient representatives' perspectives in Germany on the advantages and disadvantages of centralising inpatient healthcare services. METHODS: To meet this research aim, focus groups were facilitated. Purposive sampling was based on indications affected by minimum volume standards. In total 21 patient organisations were invited. A semi-structured interview guide on the advantages and disadvantages of centralisation was developed. Two researchers analysed the qualitative data using content analysis. RESULTS: Two focus groups with 14 patient representatives were conducted in September and October 2022. Participants discussed advantages and disadvantages with respect to treatment, patients, healthcare professionals and the healthcare system. Perceived advantages included improved treatment process and outcomes, lower complexity of care pathways, an improved distribution and less strain of healthcare professionals, and lower healthcare expenditures. Perceived disadvantages comprised the low quality of referrals and low organisational level of follow-up care as well as particularly disadvantaged groups, such as elderly patients, women and caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: Centralisation should not focus on hospitals alone, but should consider all service providers to address challenges at the transition between inpatient and outpatient care. Furthermore, policy measures should be implemented to mitigate disadvantages of specific patient groups. Patients should be involved as they can contribute novel aspects with respect to the configuration of healthcare services.

Source: Health Policy

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105582

Authors: Stefanie Pfisterer-Heise, Julia Scharfe, Alexander Pachanov, Charlotte Mareike Kugler, Dawid Pieper

Institution: Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane

Language: English

Topic: Health Services Management and Policy

Subfield: General Health Professions

Field: Health Professions

Domain: Health Sciences

SDGs: Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities

Open Access status: hybrid

Estimated APC paid: $4,220