Work

Investigating the photoactivity of CuO-TiO (Home Prepared) composites for H production by photoreforming under natural solar light in a pilot plant photoreactor

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Home-prepared TiO 2 containing an anatase/rutile mixture was coupled with different Cu 2 O amounts by the ball milling method technique. The samples were characterized by UV-Vis diffuse spectroscopy (DRS), specific surface area (SSA) determination, photoluminescence (PL) and Raman spectra, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) and photoelectrochemical measurements. The photocatalytic activity was studied for H 2 production under natural solar light irradiation in a pilot plant reactor in the presence of different sacrificial agents. An effective heterojunction that enhanced the charge transfer processes, was formed between the components, as confirmed by photoluminescence spectra. 3%Cu 2 O-TiO 2 was the most active photocatalyst and the presence of Cu 2 O (instead of the noble metals generally used) was efficient for H 2 production with 62 mmol obtained after 5 h (equivalent to ca. 5 mmol g -1 h -1 ) of solar irradiation starting from glycerol, which yielded the highest H 2 amount with respect to the other sacrificial agents. Copper was present in different oxidation states and a moderate amount of leaching of Cu species was found. Holes, OH • and O 2 •− radicals were the main active species for glycerol degradation, while a higher availability of photoproduced electrons was beneficial for H 2 production. • Home prepared anatase/rutile TiO 2 was coupled with Cu 2 O by ball milling. • Cu 2 O-TiO 2 heterostructured samples showed increased water adsorption capability and solar light harvesting. • 3% Cu 2 O-TiO 2 was effective for solar H 2 production in a pilot scale reactor. • The availability of high electrons amount following the coupling was beneficial for H 2 production.

Source: Catalysis Today

DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2026.115740