Work

“Normal” vs. “difficult” cases with eating disorders: the therapists’ perspective

Year: 2026
Type: article
Study design: Observational Study
Abstract: Introduction: Patients with an eating disorder (ED) are considered difficult to treat. We aimed to identify the characteristics of patients with an ED, which are considered especially challenging to treat from the therapist's perspective. Methods: Psychotherapists with experience in ED treatment were asked to describe a "normal" as well as a "difficult" case they treated lately, using an online-survey. They described their patients by filling in a list of symptoms and their severity, on personality traits and functioning as well as a list of possible therapeutic challenges experienced over the course of treatment. Results: 127 psychotherapists were recruited. "Difficult" cases were characterized by variables which could be related to three areas: patients´ motivation (higher level of ambivalence), interactional behavior/personality traits (more antagonism) and somatic complications, such as electrolyte imbalance. Ambivalence was the strongest predictor of case difficulty, followed by patient personality. Therapist or work place characteristics were not associated with experiencing treatments as "normal" or "difficult." Discussion: In particular, aspects related to the therapeutic process and relationship characterize the group of "difficult" cases from a therapist's view.
Language: English
Field: Psychology
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,801
OpenAlex ID: W7130347610
FWCI:
Cites: 22
Cited by:
Related to: