A Case-Study-Based Comparative Evaluation of Functional Analysis Paradigms in Aircraft System Design
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Functional analysis plays a critical role in early-stage aircraft system design by defining system functions that guide downstream architectural development and verification. In practice, many design deficiencies originate not from incorrect physical realization but from incomplete or ambiguous functional definitions established at conceptual stages. This challenge is particularly pronounced in aircraft systems, where interaction- and physical-effect-induced functions tend to remain implicit and weakly justified. To address this issue, in this study, we conduct a case-study-based comparative evaluation of three functional analysis paradigms: design-theory-oriented functional decomposition, systems-engineering-based functional allocation, and scenario-driven functional analysis. Using an aircraft ground deceleration scenario as a controlled context, this comparison examines how different function-derivation mechanisms influence the identification and justification of interaction- and effect-induced functions. Through structured cross-paradigm comparison, three distinct and, in principle, reproducible derivation mechanisms, namely decomposition-driven, responsibility-driven, and physical-effect-driven, are identified. In this study, the physical-effect-driven mechanism is examined through an effect-strengthened implementation of the scenario-driven paradigm. While all paradigms consistently identify mission-oriented functions, the examined scenario-driven implementation enhances transparency in functional justification and improves sensitivity to interaction- and effect-induced functions, thereby reducing the risk of omission during conceptual design. By formalizing these derivation mechanisms and clarifying their complementary roles, this study contributes to a clearer methodological understanding of functional identification in early-stage complex system design, while providing practical guidance for methodological selection and integration in aircraft system design.
Source: Applied Sciences
DOI: 10.3390/app16042028
Authors: Haomin Li, Meng Zhao, Yong Chen, Youbai Xie
Language: English
Subfield: Control and Systems Engineering
Field: Engineering
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $2,896
OpenAlex ID: W7130469944
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to:
