A IA em Saúde Exige uma Supervisão Contínua: Fundamentos Jurídicos e Éticos Para um Novo Quadro de Responsabilização
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: This article contends that the European frameworks governing clinical AI fail to sustain accountability once systems are in use, and that certification and documentation are not apt to capture distributed, evolving decision-making. Drawing on comparative doctrine, the paper diagnoses the gap between formal compliance and lived responsibility. It advances living oversight as a governance practice that is continuous and substantively human, reframes stewardship as a shared responsibility across developers, clinicians, institutions, and regulators, and sets out practical implications: dynamic consent, post-deployment auditing, and enforceable redress. Accountability has to be designed into operation – not verified after the event – if clinical AI is to remain compatible with the moral foundations of healthcare.
Authors: COSTA, Eva Dias, CORREIA, Mónica, NUNES, Rui
Language: English
Subfield: Health Informatics
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7130496040
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: