Comparison of two types of fixed lingual retainers in maxillary arch for retainer failures in post-orthodontic patients: a randomized clinical trial
Year: 2026
Type: article
Study designs: Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial
Abstract: Purpose Retention, a critical phase following orthodontic treatment maintains dental alignments after active treatment ceases. Fixed retainers offer a compliance-free solution, but limited evidence compares modern systems such as connected bonding pads (CBP) and titanium lingual wires (TW). This study was designed to evaluate and compare these retainers for debonding rate and frequency, post-treatment stability, periodontal health, and patient discomfort.Materials and Methods Forty patients (aged:18–25) post-orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned either CBP or TW retainers bonded to six maxillary anterior teeth. Debonding rate and frequency was scored (0–5), post-treatment stability was assessed using modified Little’s Irregularity Index (LII) and periodontal health via Gingival index, Plaque index and Russell’s periodontal index at baseline(T0), 1-month(T1), 3-month(T3) and 6-month(T6) visits and patient-reported discomfort was recorded at T1 using 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Intragroup comparisons used repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman’s test, and inter-group comparisons used independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests (p = 0.05).Results Debonding rates and frequencies showed no significant intra- or inter-group differences across time points (p > 0.05). The odds of failure for CBP retainers were 1.79 times higher than TW retainers. Both groups exhibited significant increases in LII over time (CBP:p < 0.001; TW:p = 0.001), but intergroup differences remained non-significant. Periodontal indices improved significantly, while plaque indices increased slightly(p < 0.05). Patient discomfort scores were comparable across groups.Conclusion Overall, both retainers performed similarly across key metrics, but TW retainers showed advantages like lesser chances for debonding and long-term post-treatment stability making them a promising option for orthodontic retention.
Authors: Chinmayee Chaulwar, Javed Sodawala, Piyush Khandelwal, Tanusha Mahobia, Sonam Parakh, Jyoti Panjwani
Institution: Chhattisgarh Dental College & Research Institute
Language: English
Subfield: Orthodontics
Field: Dentistry
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: diamond
OpenAlex ID: W7133931373