Work

Comparison of 4DryField PH vs. seprafilm in reducing incidence of adhesion and preventing ASBO following abdominopelvic surgery: a systematic review

Year: 2026

Type: review

Abstract: Background: Adhesions form between tissue surfaces due to inflammation and trauma to tissue. Adhesions are a common postoperative complication of abdominopelvic surgery, often leading to chronic pain, adhesive small bowel obstruction, and increased healthcare costs. Anti-adhesive agents such as Seprafilm and 4DryField PH are employed to mitigate these risks, but direct comparisons between these barriers are lacking, creating a need to evaluate their relative efficacy. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of 4DryField PH and Seprafilm in preventing postoperative adhesion formation and associated complications such as ASBO in patients undergoing abdominopelvic surgery. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and trial registries identified 7 studies, including RCTs and cohort studies. Inclusion criteria were studies involving patients aged 18 and above who underwent abdominopelvic surgery and received either 4DryField PH or Seprafilm. Studies that included patients with extensive pre-existing abdominal conditions and malignancies were excluded. Data was extracted on adhesion incidence, severity, extent, chronic pain, and ASBO. Results: 4DryField PH consistently reduced adhesion burden in second-look studies and showed no recurrent ASBO in one cohort. Seprafilm demonstrated modest benefit in one colorectal study but not in another. Due to non-overlapping populations, direct comparison was not possible. Exploratory trends favoured both agents over no barrier. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that 4DryField PH may reduce adhesion burden in settings where second-look laparoscopy is performed, while Seprafilm may offer modest clinical benefit in selected colorectal surgery contexts. Because no head-to-head trials exist and the study populations differ, these findings remain hypothesis-generating. Further multicentre trials with standardised outcomes are needed to define their comparative roles.

Source: Frontiers in Surgery

DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1729548

Authors: Shagufa Haji Cassim, Taha Luqman Bilgrami, Md Rezaul Karim, Bijendra Patel

Institutions: Queen Mary University of London, Barts Cancer Institute

Language: English

Topic: Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Subfield: Surgery

Field: Medicine

Domain: Health Sciences

SDG: Good health and well-being

Open Access status: gold

Estimated APC paid: $3,801