On the same wavelength: Rethinking fit in radiography research collaboration
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Collaboration is central to radiography research, yet many collaborations falter due to misalignment rather than lack of expertise or goodwill. Existing collaboration frameworks are largely discipline-agnostic and often prioritise productivity, roles, or outputs, with limited attention to the contextual realities of radiography practice. This narrative review aims to reframe collaboration in radiography research as a question of fit rather than selection. Specifically, it introduces and conceptualises the Wavelength Framework as a means of understanding how alignment across key domains shapes the sustainability and lived experience of collaboration. KEY FINDINGS: Drawing on literature from radiography, health professions education, and organisational scholarship, this review synthesises evidence across four interrelated domains that consistently influence collaboration experiences: pace, purpose, capacity, and positioning. The review highlights how misalignment across these domains commonly arises from structural and contextual factors such as clinical workload, hybrid practitioner-academic roles, uneven research cultures, and geographic location. Rather than reflecting individual shortcomings, collaboration strain often emerges when expectations remain implicit or fail to adapt to changing circumstances. The Wavelength Framework provides a shared conceptual language for recognising alignment and misalignment as dynamic, relational processes embedded within context. CONCLUSION: This review reframes collaboration in radiography research from a focus on who to work with to where and how collaboration fits within professional realities. The Wavelength Framework offers a discipline-specific lens for understanding why collaborations succeed, stall, or dissolve, and positions alignment, rather than individual capability, as central to collaboration sustainability. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: For radiographers, educators, and researchers, the framework supports reflective decision-making about entering, sustaining, or reshaping collaborations. By encouraging explicit negotiation of expectations and constraints, it promotes more transparent, ethical, and sustainable research partnerships across diverse radiography contexts.
Source: Radiography
Authors: M. Chau, B. Ofori-Manteaw, K. Spuur, J.L. Ago
Language: English
Subfield: Information Systems and Management
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $2,990
OpenAlex ID: W7140093263