Interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia: efficacy and clinical interpretability in a meta-analysis of 451 randomized controlled trials
Year: 2026
Type: review
Study designs: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis
Abstract: Negative symptoms (avolition, anhedonia, asociality, blunted affect, and alogia) are among the most disabling features of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In the absence of treatment consensus guidelines, this PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024613967) evaluated efficacy and clinical significance of interventions targeting this dimension. Web of Science/PsycInfo databases were searched from inception to December 2024. Five categories (antipsychotics, other pharmacological agents, brain stimulation, psychosocial, and lifestyle interventions) were analyzed across short/middle/long follow-up times. Categories were divided into 27 subcategories (e.g., 'other pharmacological agents' divided in 14 subcategories including antidepressants, antibiotics, immunomodulators) regardless of follow-up, assessing evidence with GRADE criteria. The primary outcome was the change in negative symptom severity, measured with validated scales (PANSS/SANS/BPRS/CAINS/BNSS) as standardized mean differences (SMD). A clinically meaningful SMD threshold was estimated from the regression between SMD and one-point reductions on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale. This study meta-analyzed 451 trials (n = 42566). The clinically meaningful threshold, obtained from 122 trials reporting CGI-S, was SMD ≥ 0.457. In 214 high-quality studies (n = 19746), 2 category-by-follow-up combinations and 16 subcategories showed significant improvements. Clinically meaningful SMDs for subcategories were antibiotics (0.95; CI: 0.18-1.71; moderate-GRADE), integrated psychosocial interventions (0.93; CI: 0.53-1.33; very-low-GRADE), antidepressants (0.76; CI: 0.33-1.19; moderate-GRADE), physical activity (0.68; CI: 0.39-0.96; very-low-GRADE), transcranial current stimulation (0.52; CI: 0.17-0.86; low-GRADE), and immunomodulators (0.47; CI: 0.26-0.67; high-GRADE), typically as adjuncts to antipsychotics. Heterogeneity was the main limitation. While selected interventions may yield meaningful improvements, more rigorous designs are needed to identify reliable, personalized and scalable treatment options.
Source: Molecular Psychiatry
Authors: Stefano Damiani, Riccardo Stefanelli, Lydia Fortea, Aldo D’Imperio, Matteo Calò, Francesco Casarini, Andrea Crippa, Cecilia Maria Esposito, Roberto Leggi, Marika Orlandi, Sara Patron, Alessandro Peviani, Alessandro Piccolo, Umberto Provenzani, Fabrizio Santilli, Cecilia Spallarossa, Evangelos Papanastasiou, Matteo Cella, Rashmi Patel, Marco Solmi, Silvana Galderisi, Stefan Leucht, Daniel Stahl, Joaquim Radua, Paolo Fusar-Poli
Institutions: University of Pavia, Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Lund University, Helsingborgs lasarett, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, HolsboerMaschmeyer NeuroChemie (Germany), King's College London, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, University of Cambridge, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
Language: English
Subfield: Psychiatry and Mental health
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: hybrid
Estimated APC paid: $5,490
OpenAlex ID: W7140110854
