Work

Evaluation of embedding-based and generative methods for LLM-driven document classification: Opportunities and challenges

Year: 2026
Type: conference-paper
Abstract: This work presents a comparative analysis of embedding-based and generative models for classifying geoscience technical documents. Using a multi-disciplinary benchmark dataset, we evaluated the trade-offs between model accuracy, stability, and computational cost. We find that generative Vision-Language Models (VLMs) like Qwen2.5-VL, enhanced with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, achieve superior zero-shot accuracy (82%) compared to state-of-the-art multimodal embedding models like QQMM (63%). We also demonstrate that while supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can improve VLM performance, it is sensitive to training data imbalance.
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7147633074
FWCI:
Cites:
Cited by:
Related to: