Cost comparison of osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed versus amivantamab plus lazertinib for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small cell lung cancer
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: Novel first-line (1L) combination regimens offer improved efficacy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm) locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) versus the standard of care, but their costs have not been comprehensively evaluated. Total and differential costs of 1L osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed, intravenous (IV) amivantamab plus lazertinib, and subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab plus lazertinib were estimated from a United States (US) payer perspective. A cost of care model was developed to assess treatment acquisition, administration, disease management, and adverse event (AE) management costs for osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed versus IV and SC amivantamab plus lazertinib for patients with EGFRm NSCLC. A one-year time horizon was chosen to allow for direct treatment comparison; a one-year treatment duration was assumed for treat-to-progression regimen components. The total first-year cost per-patient for osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed (all-payer perspective: $172,600; private perspective: $253,529; Medicare perspective: $84,926) was over twofold lower than for IV amivantamab plus lazertinib (all-payer perspective: $418,176; private perspective: $618,240; Medicare perspective: $201,441) and for SC amivantamab plus lazertinib (all-payer perspective: $419,718; private perspective: $621,166; Medicare perspective: $201,482). This translated to per-patient cost savings of $245,577; $364,711; and $116,514 for osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed versus IV amivantamab plus lazertinib and $247,118; $367,637; and $116,555 versus SC amivantamab plus lazertinib for the all-payer, private, and Medicare perspectives, respectively. Limited data availability necessitated cost conversions across payer perspectives and assumptions for select inputs, including specific concomitant medication durations. Additionally, as any payer-negotiated discounts for treatment are confidential, model treatment acquisition costs reflected list prices. These data limitations contributed to uncertainty surrounding model inputs. From a US payer perspective, osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed was associated with substantially lower overall costs compared with IV and SC amivantamab plus lazertinib for the 1L treatment of patients with EGFRm locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC. For patients with previously untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with certain mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene, osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed, intravenous (IV) amivantamab plus lazertinib, and subcutaneous (SC) amivantamab plus lazertinib are new treatment options. These treatments offer improved effectiveness compared with the current standard of care, but costs associated with their use have not been comprehensively compared. We developed a cost of care model to compare the cost of using each drug for the first year across multiple categories. These categories included the costs of buying each drug, being given the drug by a healthcare provider, managing side effects of the drugs, and managing the cancer itself (through healthcare visits, laboratory tests, etc.). The analysis was performed from the perspective of United States (US) payers, which are the entities responsible for financing or reimbursing the cost of health services. We focused on private and Medicare payer perspectives and also included an all-US payers perspective that assumed 52% of patients were on private insurance, 41% were on Medicare, and 7% were on Medicaid. This model showed that for US payers, osimertinib plus platinum-pemetrexed may be less costly than IV amivantamab plus lazertinib and SC amivantamab plus lazertinib for treating advanced EGFRm NSCLC in patients who have not previously received any treatment.
Source: Figshare
Language: English
Subfield: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Field: Medicine
Domain: Health Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7154171115