National-, Institutional-, and Individual-Level Determinants of Neurology and Neurosurgery Research Excellence: An Analysis of Stanford-Elsevier Lists of the Top 2% Scholars Worldwide (2017–2023)
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Neurologic research output is extensive, yet influential contributions remain unevenly distributed across countries and institutions. Prior studies have emphasized productivity rather than excellence, limiting understanding of where high-impact neurologic scholarship is concentrated and which structural conditions may support its development. METHODS: Seven annual releases (2017-2023) of the Stanford-Elsevier Lists (SELs) were analyzed between July and August 2025, and Excellent Neurologic Scholars (ENS) were extracted from the career-long and single-year SEL datasets of each release. A multilevel ecological framework was used to examine national, institutional, and individual determinants of neurologic research excellence. The main outcome measures were ENS counts, composite score, modified H-index, and citation count excluding self-citations. RESULTS: High-income countries accounted for 97.8% and 95.8% of ENS, respectively, with the USA alone contributing nearly half (50.1% and 47.1%). English-speaking countries collectively represented over two-thirds of ENS, while German ranked a distant second (∼9%). The top 20 institutions hosted 23.1% and 24.1% of ENS, with the University of California (4.5% and 4.4%) leading, underscoring marked institutional elitism. Gender disparities were evident: women comprised 18.3% of ENS in the career-long SEL and 22.4% in the single-year SEL, with males consistently achieving higher bibliometric indicators. Academic age emerged as the only stable predictor of excellence, with each additional year increasing citation counts (β = 135.1 and 2.4). Regression analyses confirmed independent effects of male gender, English language, income level, and HDI, while attenuating bivariate associations. CONCLUSION: Neurologic research excellence is disproportionately concentrated in high-income, anglophone settings and elite institutions, with persistent gender gaps. Academic age remained the strongest predictor, underscoring the need for more context-sensitive and equitable policies to support neurologic scholarship across diverse settings.
Source: Neuroepidemiology
DOI: 10.1159/000551993
Authors: Abanoub Riad, Michal Koščík
Institution: Masaryk University
Language: English
Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
Field: Decision Sciences
Domain: Social Sciences
SDG: Reduced inequalities
Open Access status: hybrid
OpenAlex ID: W7154295708