Entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate health sciences students: a scoping review protocol
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: This article presents a scoping review protocol for mapping evidence on entrepreneurial intention (EI) among undergraduate health sciences students, with emphasis on Nursing, Medicine, and Psychology. Its contribution is methodological: it converts generic Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance into a pre-specified, reusable workflow for reviews at the interface of entrepreneurship research and health professions education, two fields with distinct vocabularies. Compared with a standard JBI protocol, it adds (i) criteria-based selection of seed articles and derivation of search terms from both literatures, using truncated stems (e.g., entrepren*) and entrepreneurship-specific terms (e.g., "new venture"); (ii) a multilingual layer with Portuguese and Spanish terms and trilingual DeCS descriptors; (iii) use of reviews only for backward and forward citation chasing; (iv) a disaggregation rule for mixed samples; (v) a reproducible grey-literature procedure; and (vi) a pre-execution step justifying the added value of the review for its population and context. Seven databases and grey literature will be searched without language or date restrictions; two independent reviewers will screen and chart data, and reporting will follow PRISMA-ScR. The protocol is a starting template for reviews on EI among health sciences students; its transferable components can be adapted to adjacent disciplines.•Provides a reusable, pre-registered JBI/PRISMA-ScR workflow for scoping reviews at the interface of entrepreneurship research and health professions education, focused on entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate health sciences students.•Adds a criteria-based seed-article procedure for deriving search terms from both fields, using truncated root stems (e.g., entrepren*) and entrepreneurship-specific terms (e.g., "new venture"), together with a multilingual (English, Portuguese, Spanish) search layer.•Specifies a citation-chasing-only rule for reviews, a disaggregation rule for mixed samples, and a pre-execution step to justify the added value of the review for its population and context, indicating which components can be reused in adjacent disciplines and which must be adapted.•Strengths: the protocol follows the JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting standards, is pre-registered on the Open Science Framework, and employs a three-step search strategy that combines controlled vocabulary descriptors and free-text keywords across seven databases, with explicit core terms per PCC component, thereby enhancing transparency and reproducibility.•Limitations: in accordance with scoping review methodology, formal critical appraisal of the included studies will not be performed; studies with interdisciplinary or mixed samples may be excluded when data specific to undergraduate health sciences students cannot be disaggregated; heterogeneity across educational and cultural contexts may constrain the comparability of the synthesized findings; records in languages other than English, Portuguese, and Spanish that lack English metadata may be missed; and the protocol is a starting template for reviews on entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate health sciences students, so its population block and added-value justification must be redeveloped for other populations.
Source: MethodsX
Authors: Gustavo Gouveia Macedo, Emerson Roberto dos Santos, João Daniel de Souza Menezes, Matheus Querino da Silva, Ana Maria Rita Pedroso Vilela Torres de Carvalho Engel, Leonila Santos de Almeida Sasso, Bruna de Carvalho Regis, Walisson Trindade Batista, Marcia Regina Furlani, Cristiane Gouveia de Souza, Renata Dalbianco Bongardi, Laís Fernanda de Amorin, Giovanna Albefaro Sandonato Barbosa, Lucas Eduardo Luizão, Izaura dos Santos Ramos, Paula Buck de Oliveira Ruiz, Antônio Hélio Oliani, Denise Cristina Móz Vaz Oliani, Luís Cesar Fava Spessoto, Júlio César André
Language: English
Subfield: Management of Technology and Innovation
Domain: Social Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $1,260
OpenAlex ID: W7154462432
