Work

Bipartisan-cited science is rare, unevenly distributed, and disproportionately influential

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: This study offers a systematic analysis of scientific papers cited in both Republican and Democratic policy documents. Using data from Overton and Dimensions, we examine congressional reports, hearings, and think tank publications. We find that bipartisan citations, while rare, highlight papers of exceptional scientific influence. Policy documents citing these papers also receive more citations, amplifying their policy impact. Yet, bipartisan-cited science is unevenly distributed-concentrated in monetary policy and healthcare, but notably absent in climate, inequality, and race and gender. These results show that bipartisan engagement, though limited, marks a uniquely influential core of science in both research and policy.

Source: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2523760123

Authors: Alexander C. Furnas, Dashun Wang

Institutions: Northwestern University, Northwestern University

Language: English

Topic: scientometrics and bibliometrics research

Subfield: Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Field: Decision Sciences

Domain: Social Sciences

SDG: Reduced inequalities

Open Access status: hybrid

Funders: National Science Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Peter G. Peterson Foundation