Comparative Study on Injection Molding and Performance of Glass Fiber-Reinforced PET and PA6 Thermoplastic Insulators
Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: In ultra-high-voltage GIS and GIL systems, epoxy resin insulators are still the mainstream choice. However, as a thermosetting material, epoxy resin is difficult to recycle after disposal, which limits its environmental benefits. Thermoplastic insulators, due to their recyclability, are potential alternatives. This study focuses on 30% glass fiber-reinforced PET and PA6 materials. Their injection molding behavior, hydraulic pressure performance, and insulation performance were systematically analyzed using Moldflow, ANSYS, and COMSOL, respectively. For injection molding, Moldflow simulations were conducted for filling, packing, and cooling stages. Melt temperature was varied from 260 to –310 °C (PET) and 250–300 °C (PA6), while mold temperature was varied from 80 to –130 °C (PET) and 70–120 °C (PA6). An optimization objective function, Y = Δp/20 + Δx/0.5 + Δs/1.8, was developed to determine optimal processing parameters. Based on this function, the optimal parameters identified are: PET at 290 °C melt temperature and 120 °C mold temperature; PA6 at 250 °C melt temperature and 70 °C mold temperature. For hydraulic testing, Moldflow–ANSYS coupled simulations were performed under 2.4 MPa pressure with the compliance criteria of bulk stress < 90 MPa and insert-contact stress < 20 MPa. PA6 passed within a processing window of melt temperature < 270 °C and mold temperature < 120 °C. PET failed under all tested conditions, with insert-contact stress ranging from 24.25 to 27.55 MPa, consistently exceeding the 20 MPa threshold. In terms of insulation performance, this paper utilizes COMSOL to study the electric field distribution of thermoplastic insulators in SF6 GIS/GIL and provides optimization suggestions for insulator geometry design. This study systematically compares the injection molding processes and hydraulic pressure performance of PET and PA6 thermoplastic insulators. These results provide important process insights and design guidance for evaluating thermoplastic materials as potential alternatives to epoxy resin in GIS/GIL applications.
Source: Materials
DOI: 10.3390/ma19091729
Authors: Yao Wang, Yuliang Fu, Xiaofei Chen, Zehao Zhang, Weiqi Qin
Language: English
Subfield: Mechanical Engineering
Field: Engineering
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: gold
Estimated APC paid: $3,137
Award: G7480954374
OpenAlex ID: W7155557334
