Work

Understanding Late-Stage Clinical Trial Failure in Multiple Sclerosis: Insights from ClinicalTrials.gov

Year: 2026

Type: article

Abstract: Background: Clinical trial failure -when a study is withdrawn or terminated for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy-wastes resources and exposes patients to unnecessary risks. We examined such failures in the field of multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase III and IV MS drug trials conducted in 2008-2024. Trials were classified as normally ended or failed based on recruitment status and reported reasons. When information was missing, we reviewed publications and contacted principal investigators (PIs). Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess time to trial end and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with failure. Results: The 282 clinical trials included in our analysis involved 62 experimental drugs, primarily disease-modifying therapies (n = 213 trials). Most studies aimed to evaluate drug efficacy (n = 196 trials). Overall, 74.8% trials ended normally while 25.2% failed. On average, failed trials ended ten months earlier that the rest of studies (trial actual duration: 17.8 vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001). Main reasons for failure were low recruitment (28.2%), unspecified business decisions (26.8%) and logistical problems (12.7%). In 28.2% of occasions it remained undisclosed. Trials evaluating drug safety (OR 0.35, 95%CI 0.13-0.94) and those with ≥ 50 centres (OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.02-0.38) failed less often. Failure was not associated with other factors such as study start date, PI location or industry involvement. Conclusions: One out of four MS clinical trials fails. Increasing the number of study sites and improving recruitment strategies could enhance their success rates.

Source: Neuroepidemiology

DOI: 10.1159/000551962

Authors: Alejandro Rivero-de-Aguilar, Mónica Pérez-Ríos, Joseph S. Ross, Marta Mascareñas-García, Alberto Ruano-Raviña, Leonor Varela-Lema