Year: 2026
Type: article
Abstract: This Comment explores the growing tension between innovation and accountability in the use of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) in hiring. As employers increasingly rely on AI-driven screening tools, concerns over algorithmic bias and hidden discrimination have sparked both litigation and regulatory action. Using Mobley v. Workday, Inc. as a lens, this Comment examines the expanding scope of liability for both employers and AI vendors. It then compares emerging regulatory frameworks across the United States and European Union. This Comment concludes that Colorado’s approach to AI regulation stands out as the most com-prehensive model, offering a clearer path to reducing discrimination while preserving the benefits of AI in modern hiring practices.
Source: eYLS (Yale Law School)
Authors: Yamakawa, Pasqualle, Reid, Amber
Language: English
Subfield: Artificial Intelligence
Field: Computer Science
Domain: Physical Sciences
Open Access status: green
OpenAlex ID: W7159748099